Monday, January 30, 2006

Jurist Editorial: Dangers of Presidential Spying



Jurist has a new editorial up by guest columnist Brian Foley of Florida Coastal School of Law. Foley writes about what he perceives as the "real" danger of the Bush administration's authorization of the NSA warrantless eavesdropping program. According to Foley:

The most important issue is not, however, whether people feel comfortable talking on the phone or sending emails. The real danger is that electronic surveillance can be used to increase and solidify executive power. A president can collect private information not simply about “ordinary Americans,” but extra-ordinary ones – political rivals, journalists, and activists – and use this information against them. After all, if a president is convinced he is right, he may well view those who disagree with him as dangerous and believe it’s legitimate to use any means available to stop them.

Foley compares the danger here to what came to light "in the aftermath of President Nixon's harassment of political enemies" 30 years ago. Foley also takes a look at a few "scenarios" of what could happen if executive power is allowed to expand too far with this type of "spying" program, including the possibility of the executive using illicitly obtained information against political enemies.

According to Foley, the biggest danger is not really the theoretical potential harm to the privacy rights of ordinary citizens. Rather, it's the theoretical potential harm to the political process that could result from allowing unchecked executive power. Foley concludes:

The virtually undetectable abuses that can result from presidential spying pose an enormous and immediate threat to the viability of our government. Although the issue generally has been framed as a legal issue, perhaps to be decided ultimately by the Supreme Court – while the present administration continues surveillance under its more than four-year-old program – we must recognize that presidential spying is first and foremost a political issue. Congress should not wait for the courts to determine whether the president has broken the law but should act immediately to stop the spying – before this or any future president renders his opponents too scared to do anything but submit to his will.

3 Comments:

Blogger reader_iam said...

Eek, K! Or should I say, "Eureka." Good, good job of connecting dots.

I need to think about this more.

But not in order to say: What a valuable post!

Thanks, K!

9:56 PM  
Anonymous ray ban españa said...

.
Thanks for sharing informations.Looking forward to more stuff.

That was so cool.

4:23 AM  
Blogger 梁爵 said...

2019.12.20台北八大行業知名酒店經紀獨家分析:每當看到酒店工作酒店小姐被「框」出場性侵的新聞,就覺得很無奈,一方面是為了有酒店上班姊妹遇到這樣的事情很難過,一方面是被新聞誇張不實報導,引起社會的恐慌甚至各大留言板的對話更讓人翻白眼。某些人,對大學生/上班族酒店上班的新人對於「框」有很大的誤解。八大行業資深經紀人專業酒店打工解釋裡說的「框」,是指直接包下小姐特定的時間。其實最單純來說,功能有兩種:把小姐找過來或留下來、帶小姐出店家。有時候到店家找自己認識的小姐,但酒店小姐目前在手工(打手槍) 、口爆(口交)服務其他客人,想要把該名小姐找過來,如果用點的,遇到對方喊加點,就只能喊框了;或是有其他客人想點走正在服務自己的小姐,加點後對方又喊框,如果這時前桌喊框,效力是優於後桌的。看起來很複雜,但簡言之,就是把小姐留在自己身邊的一種方法。而「框出」的定義和內涵,就值得深入討論了。歡迎想要高收入賺現金酒店兼差的大學生/上班族,可上網求證對八大行業酒店兼職得相關資訊做核對比對甚至多比較,才能賺錢賺得安心,同時也要保護自己。

12:40 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home